Runs laps around the Flip Ultra, May 29, 2008

Customer Video Review Length:: 2:25 Mins

Creative Labs Vado Pocket Video Camcorder (Silver)

I did a comparison of the Vado vs. the Flip Ultra, and I’d say the Vado beats the Flip in every way, except the mic. The mic recorded lower for me on the Vado than the Flip when I tested the two of them at the same distance.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comments (21)

The Creative Vado Versus the Flip Mino and Ultra – The Good and The Bad, July 10, 2008

By 

Mark “Technology, Music and Movies” (East Coast) – See all my reviews

  

  

  

Customer Video Review Length:: 1:50 Mins

I wanted to find out if the new Creative Labs Vado Pocket Video Camcorder (Silver) was better than the Flip Video Mino Series Camcorder (Black) or the Flip Video Ultra Series Camcorder (Black). I myself am surprised by the answer I came up with. The real answer may be, “none of the above.”

While all three are *good* devices for what they do, I am still searching for my perfect digital camcorder to come out at the right price. The short answer is the quality of video and audio on the Flip Mino is noticeably better than the Creative Vado, even when it’s at its highest setting. However, for most users, the Creative Vado will probably meet your expectations at a much better price than the Flip Mino. The Mino’s recent price drop makes the decision slightly harder, but there’s still enough of a price difference to make the Vado attractive.

Pros

+ Video quality is ok on the Vado (similar to the Ultra) and much better on the Mino – Advantage, Mino

+ While the Ultra worked with removable batteries and the Mino has a built-in rechargeable battery, the Creative Vado has a rechargeable battery that is user changeable and can be easily swapped for extended recording – BIG Advantage, Vado

+ The Vado gives you the option of recording in SP for longer record times, and the quality difference is minimal – Advantage, Vado

+ The microphone sensitivity is below average on the Vado and slightly better on the Mino – Advantage, Mino

+ The low light performance is subpar on all three units but slightly better on the Mino – Advantage, Mino

+ Both the Vado and the Mino are easily recharged by USB connection, but the Vado includes an option for quick-charging – Advantage, Vado

+ Both include ports for AV out connections to TVs, but the Mino comes with the cable and the Vado does not – Advantage, Mino

+ The included software is self-contained on both units and seems to work fine, but the Vado requires much less to be installed – Advantage, Vado

+ Ability to zoom seems weak on both, though the Mino does perform slightly better – Advantage, Mino

+ Both have a screw hole for attaching a tri-pod or similar stand, but the Mino’s is centered and the Vado’s is off-center (on the lower right) – Advantage, Mino

+ In terms of looks, the Vado’s body is thinner and wider, and the Mino is slightly thicker but not as wide; the Mino definitely looks slicker, though the black plastic will attract finger-prints; Also, the Vado comes in different colors – Advantage, Mino

+ Nice indicator shows when either unit is capturing video – Draw

+ The buttons on the Vado are real tactile buttons that have nice feedback; The Flip Mino controls are touch sensitive (except for the record button) – This is a matter of preference, and both are nice, but I prefer the real buttons on the Vado; The Mino seems to have a lag when pressing the controls – Advantage, Vado

+ The Vado’s screen is slightly larger and wider than the Mino’s – Advantage, Vado

+ The built in speaker on the Vado is not nearly as good as the dual speakers on the Mino – Advantage Mino

+ The Price on the Vado is much better (just under , depending on color) while the Mino sells for much more (listed for 0, sells for about 0)

Cons

- The USB dongle on the Vado is flexible but has a tab that sticks out from the body, while the Mino has a slick USB connector that tucks into the body and is released via a tab – Advantage, Mino

- Users who want to use a dedicated microphone are provided no jack on these devices for that purpose – Draw

- Neither unit has a headphone jack for checking audio playback on recorded videos – Draw, but the weaker speaker on the Vado makes this hurt the Vado more

- Still has some software issues that will hopefully be fixed with updates – Advantage, Mino

- The Vado requires you to install the XVid codec to use the built-in software – Not a huge deal, Draw

- Not as much support for Mac users in terms of software

- The Vado comes with no carrying case or dongle included, while the Mino comes with a cheap pouch and a dongle – Advantage, Mino

- Vado packaging definitely seems cheap, while the Mino is presented in a box that is reminiscent of the packaging of Zunes and iPods – Advantage, Mino

- The Vado’s on screen menus are definitely not as nice, and the Vado Central…

Read more

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comments (10)

Don’t be Hollywood, be Cannes, January 24, 2009

I spent many hours reading every blog and user review to decide between Creative’s Vado and Flip’s Mino. As my indecision continued I realized where the reviews went wrong. People watch movies because they tell a good story, not because they have slightly better quality. I’d much rather watch interesting characters in low-def than boring ones in high-def. To put it another way, the quality of the camera comes from the person pointing it, not the lens the light passes through.

Unfortunately, reviews confuse buyers by focusing on the the camera’s technical aspects and irrelevant differences in video quality. “Technically” there is nothing wrong with this. Differences, after all, exist between different cameras. However, consider how reviewers review: shoot two identical scenes, one with the Vado and one with the Flip to compare aspects such as lighting, detail, color reproduction. Then, you compare them side by side and mark your preference. As a result, most reviews tend to favor the Mino in the side by side ranking. (On a side note, Creative released a firware update to improve Vado’s quality and almost all the user reviews never updated their post to reflect the improved quality.)

The side-by-side method is wrong.

I started thinking I should purchase a Mino because of the reviewer’s high marks. After all, the Mino got an A- while the Vado got a B. And then it hit me. All the reviewers have the wrong perspective. They are examining features because they are easy to examine rather than because it needs to be examined. Let me clarify the last sentence. Is video quality important? Of course. However, here is the problem, reviewers tend to make a big deal out of small differences in quality. The marginal difference in quality is NOT great. On a 1-10 scale (10 = ,000 camera) the Mino and Vado rate a 5 and 4.9 respectively. In other words, there IS a difference in video quality between the Mino and the Vado. Unfortunately this difference is only apparent when the Mino is the reference point. There is NO difference in quality when a ,000 camera is the reference point.

The lack of marginal difference in quality brings me to my second point, and the title of my review, “Don’t be Hollywood, be Cannes.” Hollywood is often criticized for putting special effects above the story. It is as if huge explosions and high-speed car chases make up for a weak story and uninteresting characters. Movies that do well at Cannes, on the other hand, are often nothing more than two people talking–no loud “booms” or flashy Austin Martins. Don’t choose these cameras because they produce suburb video. Instead, choose a camera because it will help you share the magic of your child’s birthday party to your friends. Small cameras are great because you can easily capture the every day moments that big cameras are, well, too big for. Your friends will enjoy your movie because it tells a good story–not because the Mino has a minuscule edge in quality. Trust me.

This brings me to my second point. Why did I choose the Vado? I choose the Vado for two reasons.

First, the Vado has a wider angle lens. Only one review mentioned this. (http://camdoctor.tistory.com/379). They list the Vado at 49 degrees and the Mino at 38 degrees. What does this mean? In short, the angle of the lens is a measure of how much you can fit in the frame. For example, if you stood 5 feet from your subject, the Vado captures more of the scene than the Mino. To put it another way, you can stand closer to the subject and capture the same area with the Vado as with the Mino. This is important because better films are produced when you are closer to your subject. Not only is being closer more “intimate” it also improves sound quality because better sound drastically degrades the farther you get from your subject.

The second reason I choose the Vado is the price difference. The Vado is half the Mino’s price ( v. 0 at the time of this post). The Mino is not TWO times better than the Vado as the price would suggest. The Mino, is at most, 5% better than the Vado and I would buy the Mino at 0, but not at 0. Don’t let other reviews and blogs trick you into thinking that the Mino is worth twice the Vado because the quality is “slightly” better.

Remember, you are buying this camera to record memories and make stories–moments that last for generations. Video quality is good, but remember, it plays second fiddle to what’s important, memories and a story.

So, what can you do with the extra ? Since your family will appreciate better movies, not slightly better quality, I suggest leaning about camera angles and shot direction by purchasing “Shot by Shot” or “Setting Up Your Shot” (search Amazon). Another thought is purchasing the Gorillapod tripod, which will let you position your camera anywhere to record a scene. By using a tripod YOU can enter the…

Read more

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comments (11)

great little gadget, March 15, 2010

I bought two of these. One for myself and one as a gift for new parents. I love it and they love it more. He never leaves the house without it. Great for catching all of those parental moments you might normally miss with a growing child. I love it for everyday stupid stuff like taping people in the grocery store with toilet paper stuck on their shoe. It’s very easy to upload to youtube also. It’s very easy to use. The battery lasts super long too. I would recommend it to anybody. It’s obviously not the best one on the market but for the price and what most people would use it for it’s awesome and well worth the money.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment

Another satisfied creative labs customer, July 5, 2010

Great value for the price. Good quality video suprisingly good sound. Easy enough for anyone to use.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment

An Amazing Little Toy!!!, October 25, 2010

Since I avidly digest consumer reviews, I feel duty-bound to share my experiences with products. I waited a few months to share my thoughts, just to see how this mini-camcorder would perform. I paid a grand total of for it; purchasing it, solely, to record action memories of my dogs. I must confess that I located the item while perusing the Creative Labs (the world’s finest manufacturer of reasonably-priced computer speakers) website; I figured, if Creative makes it, it can’t be too bad–in spite of the alarmingly-low price, and the fact that, I believe, this was a discontinued, or superceded, model.

No matter: it works great!! I am, by no means, a shutter-bug, so I haven’t even bothered to explore the various nuances of the device. For example, one of the review questions asks you about zoom capability: the toy may have it, but I haven’t looked for it. If I want a close-up of my babies, I just get closer. Sophistication is not my intent; all I want are some videos of my dogs in action. Nevertheless, this option may be a feature on this model.

What I can tell you is that it shoots wonderfully-clear videos, with remarkably-clear audio: an aspect I wasn’t even expecting! I didn’t discover this bonus until I loaded the videos on my computer (it’s so easy!) and watched a couple to make sure I had done it correctly.

All you do with this machine is push a button and, looking at the screen, aim it–and get your fingers out of the way. It charges through a USB port in your computer; and, when you want to download, you just plug it in and copy the videos. It’s amazing (at least to a positively casual photographer, like me)!!

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment

Maybe I love it because I got it so cheap?, July 20, 2010

By 

Michael D. Collier “No Telling What I Will Like” (Atlanta, GA USA) – See all my reviews

  

A nice little device, works quite well and intuitively. Pretty slick little hat trick that the software runs from the device, allowing you to plug into any computer and upload. Picture quality is good, not great, but good. It is extremely light and compact, so I tend to carry it with me.

I bought mine as a dented box special for , which is almost sinfully cheap. I’d like it if I paid more, but, at this price, I think it’s love!

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment

Great compact camcorder!, May 10, 2010

By 

Sumeet Bhasin “Indianzo” (CowBoyLand, TX) – See all my reviews

  

Quite a handy camcorder and a cheap video solution. Recording is grainy in not so perfect lighting conditions. Recording is best at close range and thus the 4 star rating. Plus feature: Easy to upload to PC or Utube without any hassle.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

>Report abuse
| Permalink

 Comment