I’ve employed increased-end ProSumer camcorders for a although and almost every other generation of video camcorder given that 1980. I not too long ago utilised a Sony HC3 HDV handheld but gave that to my daughter when I got this HV30.

The HV30 has a fantastic picture and all that. So I believe I will focus on what’s either truly cool, or a bit off-placing for a purchaser.

Actually Cool:
Video good quality is the greatest you can uncover on today’s one-chip HDV camera. Some 3-chip cameras have a greater color depth but several three-chip cameras in fact have a worse image. They did a great occupation.

It plays other Canon HDV tape. I own and use a XH A1 three-CCD canon HDV digital camera and the HV30 plays its tapes even far better than the XHA1 appears to. That is great simply because I can save the A1′s guts for a handful of much more many years.

It has virtually every output port you could wish for (nowadays). HDMI, Component (yes Component!), Composite, USB and Firewire. Its really full.

It worked with Apple FinalCut Pro without having any problems. I cannot even get he XHA1 to work with it without having screwing close to with it for a whilst.

It has a mic input jack which Podcasters enjoy, but I and other have been acquiring trouble with it. I feel Canon did not make a basic mic jack but some type of phantom powered mic this or that, which hobbyist would not really use. So to make it operate, and this is the tip, you have to go into the menu and turn on an choice, then go into a diverse menu and modify the acquire and/or volume. Oops, possibly this really should be a “not so cool” item.


The Not so Cool.

The ergonomics are poor. My hand doesn’t experience comfortable holding it no matter how I modify the hand strap. I’ve in no way had this situation with any other digital camera.

The Record start/cease button is in the incorrect place. They put their goofy “joy stick” appropriate in which a person’s thumb falls while holding the camera, so you happen to be instinctively pushing on the joystick instead of the start/stop button whilst filming. The worse part, the Joystick is actually crap as an interface element.

Noisy digital camera. The camera makes noise when you move it (shake it) it tends to make noise when you zoom and it makes a ton of noise when you insert or eject a tape.

Poor image when filming movement. If you happen to be filming a scene and you move the digital camera, you are going to get streaking of the picture. Why? I feel/assume its due to the fact in contrast to Canon’s fantastic D-SLR cameras in very low light, their video gear does not have the reduce ISO (reduced light) capability that Sony’s or everyone else has. Not positive why, but it looks to be a constant theme with Canon. Thankfully it has a built-in light valuable for those birthday parties but not significantly else.

The Bottom Line

For the beneath 0 it costs, its really worth it if you are filming your vacations, holidays, birthdays and whatnot.

If you happen to be a podcaster and want a thing with every single connection acknowledged to man, its much more than really worth it for the HDMI and mic jacks alone.

If you want you could afford the Canon XH A1 or better and want practically as great a image, this is the camera for you.

If you simply want a tape drive for your XH A1, this is really more affordable than a commercial CANON HDV tape drive.

The bottom, bottom line is Sony had lost its way and CANON’s HV30 is the present champ in the hand-held HDV camcorder race. I like sony better, but I don’t like finding nickeled and dimed to death. You buy the Canon HV30 and you are going to be pleased with the final results.

Canon VIXIA HV30 MiniDV Substantial Definition Camcorder with 10x Optical Picture Stabilized Zoom

I am extremely joyful with my Canon HV30. I rate the image good quality, colour good quality, reduced-light capability, white balance all exceptional. The zoom manage is a tiny close for my fingers and I discovered myself holding the camera less firmly (ie with the suggestions of my fingers rather than my complete hand) which would be wearisome on a extended shoot, but tripods are nevertheless the greatest way to shoot video for constant photos. On the other hand the anti-vibration correction would seem to support a lot.

The total package is great, not excellent and includes a battery with a nice make contact with protector that does not look like it will fall off (unlike the protector plate on the Elura and Optura that has to be taped on simply because it is so loose.) The plate keeps the battery from discharging on the keys in your pocket or bag. It also incorporates a charger which will also operate the camera with out the battery, which is extremely handy. This is only good, because it will not charge the battery unless of course it is in the camera, so you can’t charge while shooting with an additional battery.

The package also includes a remote manage (see over) that frustrated me the initial time I utilized it and looks to be of marginal utility. Even so, all of the minor troubles with the package can be remedied with an add-on accessory. The camera is what does the perform and it is excellent.

I’ve had this camcorder only one particular week. It was a active week with kids graduation and parties and night club rock concerts on the video agenda but I discovered a lot buying for this camera and using it all week, so possibly my story will aid you.

First, why miniDV rather than flash, difficult disk or dvd? I previously have two mini dv cameras, a Canon Optura and an Elura. These have provided me excellent service and images that have been the envy of my Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic-owning friends. The only brand I compare to Canon is Sony (for equivalent client devices). I rejected the flash and DVD designs because the recording time is also short. DVD, in specific, is a rip-off with just 15 minutes for a $ ten disk.

This sort of quick recording time is Okay if what you want is to capture one or 2 minutes of magic moments and have them immediately available to place in a player. Personally I uncover the tape just as great for instant replay on the developed-in video screen. It takes a couple minutes lengthier to rewind the tape.

The difficult drive models have a recording time advantage that initially attracted me, but the transfer problem is what created me make a decision to keep with a minidv. Eventually all video has to be transfered to yet another medium to be utilised and archived. I have been transfering my minidv tapes to personal computer hard drives and dvd for a long time.

Transfer is a tediuos, time-eating method that has caused me to devote a lot more upgrading my personal computer and computer software than I spent on the cameras. Yes, I can make DVDs with my video I can make YouTube videos and I can put my personal video stuff on my iPod and Zune. But it takes a lot of time to get the outcomes I want.

Why tape? It really is cheap and handy. Video requires a lot of disk area to retailer the authentic and then to edit and render into other formats. I acquire the low cost tapes but I only record them when. I can carry 2 or three which give me 2 or 3 hours recording time. The true restraint is the batteries. Once I have the picture on tape I do not erase it. I can play it quickly if I want to, but the ultimate objective is to transfer it to tough disk for editing and archiving. The true godsend is the modern plethora of cheap 500 GB (now 750 and soon 1TB) external USB tough drives. The transfer time is a chore so is the indexing.

Tape is patient. I can do it on my schedule. With a difficult disk, it can get complete at a time that is inconvenient to transfer but I need to have to do some a lot more shooting. Then I would have to think about the dreaded DELETE of something I shot. With tape I can postphone transfering and editing for months with no impairing my digital camera readiness. Right after I transfer, I even now have the tape.

I deemed the Sony HDR-HC9 and the older Canon HV20 vs. the Canon HV30. I was tempted by the 6MP in the Sony and also by the low costs on the HV20. I saw a deal on an HV20 for 0 but it was gone before I created up my mind to settle for it. Eventually I was hunting at 9 for the Sony or 1 for the Canon. The HV30 had 30p mode and the 8 savings provided a price range for extra batteries and other goodies.

So am I pleased? Yes.

My wife used it at my kids’ graduation. Best colour and detail, oohs and ahs from everybody. My wife just makes use of automatic mode with the lcd screen hanging out. I took some mobile shots in my vehicle, one-handed through the…

Study more

I’ve had the HV30 for about one week now, and so far I think it’s excellent.
I previously utilised the Sony TRV38, an additional quite capable camcorder. The HV30 comes in a slick, black color and is slightly smaller sized than my Sony TRV38.

I have 3 young children, so I take tons of video mostly indoors. The HV30 has very very good reduced light capability. There’s some grain in the darker movies, and the shutter speed also slows (you can see the stuttering motion in the video when taking in really reduced light). However, you can nonetheless see faces obviously. A single cool thing I like about this camera is that it has a manual controlled LED light that can add about three feet of light when it really is also dark. Sony has that lux Evening Shot that operates in comprehensive darkness, but the colours alter to green and black and tends to make the eyes search scary. I choose the LED light characteristic on the HV30 more than Sony’s Night Shot.

You can decide on from 5 distinct shooting modes:
one. DV (normal)
2. DV (wide screen)
3. HDV (high definition – broad screen by default)
4. HDV 24P (cinema mode)
5. HDV 30P (progressive mode)

Despite the fact that I do not have a high definition Tv yet, the colours in each mode looked wonderful on my typical Tv. The 24P and 30P modes give the video a “movie search and really feel” (as a result the name cinema mode), and this is cool just to have. I appear forward to shooting some thing all in 24P or 30P and showing the DVD to household/pals. I’m confident they’ll be amazed that my house videos do not “appear” like home movies…..and this is all due to the camcorder modes.

You can take images employing the HV30 (saves onto mini SD card). You can use the camcorder as a stand-alone digital camera (3 megapixels), and there is even a flash on the camcorder for the digital camera. You can also take even now images whilst you’re recording video. I use this to take images whilst recording only since it really is a nice tiny additional thing to have. The photographs are not all that excellent but not terrible either. It is definitely a bonus that the two video and nonetheless photographs are constructed into this one particular camera. I would still recommend a committed digital camera to take greater top quality nevertheless photographs.

I backup all my videos to DVD due to the fact it’s less complicated to watch that way. I favor the miniDV tapes since it shops “pure” video and information like the time and date. I just started out doing a little video editing making use of Sony Vegas computer software….and that seems to be a good computer software package. The final video on the resulting DVD appears fantastic.

I thought I would stick with Sony goods, but so far I am enjoying the Canon HV30 and have no regrets.

I will most likely be adding a lot more to this evaluation as I use the camera much more.

Update April 7, 2008
Nevertheless liking the camcorder because of the 24P and 30P modes. You can truly see that big difference in the photos compared to regular mode. Your video editing computer software should assistance HDV (substantial definition video) in order for you to edit any high definition stuff. Sony Vegas Film Studio doesn’t have it, but the Vegas Film Studio Platinum edition DOES have it. Make positive to get the appropriate software package if you are going to do editing.

I noticed that the sound is a tiny soft. Maybe there is a setting for this, but an additional possible purpose is that the Canon’s HV30′s microphones are on the top rated of the camcorder facing up compared the my Sony TRV38′s microphones on the front facing forward. This does not bother me also considerably.

There’s an automatic lens cap which helps make safeguarding the lens very convenient. No a lot more fussing with a lens cap or possessing it dangle in your videos.

The package does not consist of a neck strap…you would think Canon would throw in a strap for a 0 camcorder. I bought a standard Canon strap at a regional store for . I believe this is worth to have to preserve the camcorder safe.

The battery is a cheap a single and keeps a charge for about an hour or significantly less. Given that a miniDV tape is 1 hour, it would be prudent to get a better battery just to be safe and sound. Canon helps make an extended battery for about .

I’ve carried out far more research on mass-marketed higher-definition camcorders than any person with a work truly should. Following weeks of combing and contemplating the pros and cons of AVCHD vs. HDV, HDD vs. tape vs. flash, I decided on the HV30, considering that I was persuaded by arguments about and examples of video good quality, specifically in reduced-light. Got the HV30 and, indeed, the picture good quality is gorgeous. The sound, even though, was a wonderful disappointment. Because I am fond of capturing quiet moments – the subtle sounds of, say, my four-month-old daughter sleeping – the substantial-pitch whine of the tape motor present in my recordings with the HV30 proved to be a deal killer. (I am effectively conscious of broad array of solutions to this difficulty, from external microphones to post-production techniques, but I’d ideally like to stay away from carrying all around further devices and I only have so a lot time to invest on this hobby – I will leave in-depth editing to these far more committed, working towards diverse ends, and/or with out family commitments.)

I must have stuck to my gut instincts and bought the HF100 the 1st time all around. After sending the HV30 back (thanks to Amazon’s superb return policy), I bought the HF100 and am basically delighted. Video *and* audio are fairly darn excellent if not exceptional. Maybe a person can split hairs and demonstrate the “artifacts” present between video recordings of this AVCHD camcorder vs. an HDV one, but I just cannot see a big difference when played at typical speed. The distinction in sound recordings amongst this flash-based camcorder and comparable motorized machines is, to my ear, the two obvious and dramatic. So if you happen to be delicate to white noise or if you happen to be interested in minimizing/eliminating sounds from the recorder, believe tough about the type of camcorder you purchase and what you happen to be willing to tolerate or accommodate in terms of added gear or post-production.

A final note/aside on my very own take on the HF10 vs. the HF100: I enjoy the allure of the black-physique HF10 in terms of aesthetics, but I really find the dual flash memory characteristic to be a turn-off. I’d personally rather just handle a single, removable media card. Looks like a small inconvenience to deal with each internal memory and removable cards when recording hrs of footage before transferring/backing-up to a Computer (whilst traveling, possibly?). I’d preferably swap and label cards. But this, of program, is a matter of person preference and habit I incorporate my thoughts right here in case anyone hadn’t given this aspect some consideration.

I spent a extremely extended time studying little SD based mostly higher def cameras and ended up picking the Vixia HF100. This right after owning a Panasonic SD3 for a brief period final year. Soon after a complete weekend playing with the HF100 I am really pleased with my determination.

My enthusiasm for deciding on this digital camera more than the competitors was Canon’s very smart determination to include a common microphone input (and manual audio controls). Why other manufacturers are removing this attribute from customer camcorders baffles me since excellent audio is such an crucial part of creating good video! Canon also includes a mini hot shoe on the best of the device, and there is previously a mini shotgun mic offered (Canon 2591B002 DM-100 Directional Stereo Microphone for HF10 and HF100 Camcorders).

In several ways the HF100 is not a lot distinct from its competitors. It really is about soda can sized (despite the fact that not as tiny as the new Panasonic SD9), has no view finder, and records video onto SDHC flash memory. Flash memory is so low-cost proper now that spending the added income for the HF10 (with the on board storage) actually is not worth it.

VIDEO Top quality &amp Options
Outstanding and steady with other cameras in its class. Color high quality is wealthy and possibly a little over-saturated (as most client cameras are) but there are settings to wind back the saturation a bit (like switching into cinema mode). Artifacts are minimal but bear in mind that AVCHD is a highly compressed video format. Individuals looking for the absolute best quality in a buyer camera will want to look at an HDV tape based resolution. There are settings for manual white balancing as well.

Low light efficiency is so-so.. Gets a bit grainy but you can make adjustments to compensate both in frame rate and shutter/aperture settings. There’s also a mini-video light that can be turned on but it will not have room-filling array to it.

The camera has many video top quality options but you’ll want to decide on the highest high quality as it’s not on by default. I am getting about an hour of video on an 8 gig SD card in the highest top quality mode.

The digital camera also includes three frame rate choices: 60i, 30p, and 24p. All of these are processed at 60i so you will want an editor that can get rid of the pulldown for genuine 24P.

BATTERY Lifestyle
Like every single other digital camera in its class, the incorporated battery is pretty lousy. It costs speedily but you’ll only get about an hour or so of recording time. Canon does make an extended battery which I strategy on purchasing soon.

CONNECTIVITY &amp EDITING
I am a Mac guy so those of you using Windows will have to comment under on your accomplishment with it. On the Mac side the two iMovie ’08 and Final Reduce Pro 6 identify video from this camera even if I am just popping the SD card into my USB card reader.

If you are coming from the HDV tape-based globe, capturing video from an AVCHD camera requires a little lengthier than you are going to be employed to. I’ve found multiplying the authentic video length occasions two is usually about the length of time it takes to capture with iMovie on my Mac Pro (I have not timed Final Cut’s conversion but but will update this assessment quickly). I’m confident this will increase more than time as computer systems and software program get more quickly, but don’t anticipate immediate gratification when you’re prepared to bring some video more than to edit.

CONCLUSION
I bought this digital camera to supplement some of the function I do shooting HDV video on a ‘prosumer’ Sony HDV digital camera. If you happen to be significant about making HD video you may well nonetheless want to consider an HDV tape based camcorder like the Canon HV20 or HV30. You’ll get far better and more steady good quality along with almost universal editing compatibility. Those cameras transfer video back to the Pc or Mac above firewire, a normal that’s been around for above a decade. The HDV cameras can also run live video back to the Computer for editing or webcasting, one thing you cannot do presently with an AVCHD cam.

If, however, you’re in the industry for a tiny flash based camera look no more. The inclusion of a mic port along with the multitude of shooting options make this a wonderful alternative for beginners and fanatics alike.

This is my 1st video digital camera and I am a geek so please pardon me if I get a small technical as I am the sort of guy who shops just by comparing specs.

Prior to this, my only knowledge with video cameras exactly where those that I borrowed from close friends and family members above the many years to cover the occasional family members event – I choose shooting with a even now camera. I have been shooting with SLR’s for the previous 25 many years (all Nikons from the FM2 to the D3) so I am biased towards prints presentation and web sharing. This can make me a johnny-come-recently into the camcorder planet.

2008 saw the confluence of our 1st HDTV, Canon’s release of an inexpensive genuine HD-resolution camcorder, and inexpensive flash-memory storage. So it eventually hit me that *proper now* is the time to get into recording life’s sweet moments on “tape.” (And at 16:9 1920×1080 resolution at that! I’m a geek bear in mind?)

I reside in a developing nation in Asia in which new gizmos are always late to marketplace and priced 30-50% a lot more so the only way to discover what I want is to store online by specs. I’ve compared and read each and every user review of all the accessible models from Sony, JVC, Panasonic, and Canon and the lately-announced and released HF100 confident got almost everything correct on paper! I received my Amazon package 2 days ago and I’m content to report that this small gem is Exactly what I wished and expected!

These are what I was looking for and which, happily, I got:

one. Flash-memory based mostly recording on SD
I can not deal with tape nor am I at ease with a spinning drive inside a piece of devices that I may drop. Sony’s Memory Sticks don’t fit my planet and with Transcend Class 6 16Gb SD cards priced at only , the HF100 is ideal for my workflow! (I devote 10-16hrs a day in front of a Pc.)

I’ve made the decision to shoot all my materials using FX mode and a 16Gb card is great for 2hours really worth of video. (Side note: the standard BP809 battery is excellent for only about 1hr so you far better get an additional a single.)

2. True HD quality
I still have to get myself a HDMI cable but the component-out signal on my LCD is crisp and more than what I anticipated! To my eye, it’s as good as the prosumer-level designs that I’ve been wanting to get but can’t justify.

three. Quick concentrate
The focusing operates darn properly. It really is not one hundred% but it really is extremely near. And this is from a guy who’s spoiled by the quickly- and multi-point focusing of pro-level DSLR’s and lenses.

four. OIS
Typically operates, you gotta give it a half-2nd or so to stabilize and the LCD viewfinder is a fantastic way to balance the unit with two hands. As soon as you zoom all the way to 12x even though, I advocate making use of a tripod esp when shooting for prolonged periods of time (like stage performances).

5. Output files
The files are saved in MTS format and right after Googling for half an hour, I was ready to download a couple of freeware transcoders and converted a 46-2nd 89Mb 1920×1080 clip and downsized it into a 16Mb 848×480 XVid AVI which is gentler on my Mediagate MG-350 hard disk media player. I intend to archive all originals on BluRay and downsample the files to make it simpler to share, think YouTube, Windows Media Player, hard disk media gamers, iPhones, etc…

6. Size and construct
Yep, it is truly the dimension of soda can and very, extremely insconspicuous. It has metallic gun metal finish and, though not as aesthetically pleasing as the black HF10, it really is much better-searching than the pics on the internet. The size is a welcome adjust from the program harassment I get from overzealous mall security who thinks I am out to make a rapid buck promoting photos of mall scenes and/or architecture everytime I fish out my so-known as ‘professional’ DSLR. I shot all day nowadays and no one particular even noticed. The construct is best, like what we’re employed to assume from higher-good quality, super-miniaturized goods from Japan. For what it really is really worth, the unit I got is labeled Created in Japan.

7. Consumer interface
I have not read the manual nevertheless as the basic camcorder things is effortless. But I concur with the observation that the Begin/Stop and Digital camera/VIDEO RECORD/PLAYBACK switches could have been created better. I choose the Sony method where a rotating collar representing the distinct modes rings a large round red button. The on-screen menu can be much better but it’s liveable. I’m so utilized to the intuitive interface of Nikon cameras so I guess I should not be surprised that (just) some of the quirkiness of Canon’s camera interface design can also be discovered on their camcorders. For example, there are way too several clicks to get a clip deleted. I also want that scrolling through the clips is quick as browsing by means of a digicam’s thumbnails.

8. Optics
Primarily based on what I see on the LCD Tv, they’re wonderful! I’m a wide-angle shooter so my next buy is a .5x broad angle converter, but I am now hesitating against acquiring the models as they might not do justice…

Read much more

I had the award-winning HDV (tape-primarily based) HV20 prior to this, and the HF10 is almost indistinguishable in terms of image good quality. Provided the dramatic distinction in image data in between an HDV image and an AVC image, that means this is one particular heck of a camcorder. I have tried out other AVC camcorders and have been truly disappointed. Not so here, and I purchased this a single. It has 24p and 30p recording, in addition to 60i. (Do not be confused by Canon’s nomenclature, it is true 24p, just recorded in interlaced 60i.) The cinema mode has a bit of a wash-out effect on colours. The camcorder is surprisingly little. Power save mode is excellent, and is practically instantaneously on when the LCD display is opened. One particular warning about AVC in common, if you don’t have a fast personal computer, it will grind it to a halt. I have a quad-core with 4 gig RAM and editing is fine, but I wouldn’t want to use an old pc. Sony Vegas works great with the files. Wish the camcorder instantly saved to the SDHC card when the internal storage was total. Otherwise, this is the greatest believed out camcorder because my DVX-100. Great to occasionally see consumer items worth their expense.

This is a marvelous camcorder. Rather than repeat what some of the other testimonials have mentioned, I thought I’d explain how to import video on the Mac, simply because it wasn’t clear to me. 1st, you ought to have an Intel based mostly Mac operating Mac OS X ten.five (Leopard). You also require iMovie ’08, which comes with new Macs. If you are running an older version of Mac OS X (this kind of as Tiger) or have an older version of iMovie, or have a PowerPC based mostly Mac, you will not be capable to import video from this camera.

To import video, attach the camcorder to the Mac with the USB cable that’s integrated with the camcorder. Make certain you plug your camcorder into AC power, operating from the battery will not operate. Set the mode dial on the camera to video playback (the small blue camcorder icon). Turn on the camcorder. Now open the LCD show on the camcorder, and you will see it is asking you a question: use the joystick to choose “pc” for wherever you happen to be connecting the USB cable. I spent some time the very first time I needed to import wondering why iMovie could not see the camcorder until I lastly attempted opening the LCD display and seen this query. Once you have produced this alternative, iMovie will detect the camcorder and will be ready to import video, and you can do the rest from iMovie.

This is a amazing camera but folks need to have to have a lot more realistic expectations of what to expect from AVCHD. It is a very compressed format so making use of this camera in low-light situations is going to produce rather “grainy” results. In great lighting AVCHD output from this camera can generate some really fantastic hunting results in HD but do not kid yourself into considering you are going to get expert HDTV quality. This is a point-and-shoot.

I really like the camera, particularly how rapidly it focuses in good light, so I’m going to concentrate on what some of the other reviewers mentioned to correct some misconceptions.

I use each Macs and Computer and I have to inform you that you that PCs suck for AVCHD – you will waste a lot of time and pull your hair out. I’m confident Pc video software package vendors will handle this at some point, but seriously folks if you want to do this the easy way get an Intel-primarily based Mac (caveat: only Intel based machines employing Leopard support AVCHD) and use both iMovie or Final Cut Express four. Both of these applications (iMovie 08 and FCE4) just Adore this camera (and two other Sony AVCHD cameras I’ve attempted as effectively) and they operate like a charm. Video creating has by no means been this easy. FCE4 lets you mix AVHCD, HDV and SD video on the very same timeline and save in what ever format you want so it is really worth the 0 if you want to do that or have much more exacting management more than your videos. It is basically a (lightly) stripped-down version of Apple’s outstanding expert video computer software (Final Cut Pro) and it is extremely very good. For most property videos iMovie 08 (which comes in iLife 08) will be just fine.

I’ve had no dilemma transferring the motion pictures immediately from the camera but, as mentioned earlier, you do require to have the camera plugged into the AC to do it. You can avoid plugging the camera into your Mac to transfer the files if you happen to be only recording on SDHC cards, rather than internal memory on the HF10, but it operates just fine. For this explanation I would advocate acquiring the HF100 (more than the HF10) and getting an extra 16Gb memory card or two. You will conserve money that way and have much more flexibility. I bought the HF10 simply because I had to have it the up coming day and, at the time, the HF100s had been delayed a bit. Transcend’s outstanding 16Gb SDHC Class 6 card comes with a nifty small card reader for only .98 right here on Amazon, you can get two of them for much less than the 0 big difference in value between the HF10 and HF100 so you are going to have 32gb to operate with as a substitute of 16gb for less money. I do not mind having the internal memory as a backup but you spend far more than it is really worth for it.

The video camera is just acting like a USB reader when you connect it to your Mac anyway – it is the file layouts that the software package recognizes. When study in and converted to Apple Intermediate Codec at 1920×1080 they will balloon in dimension. If you want to retailer the raw video in a much more compressed way you can simply copy the root directory of the card to another directory and copy it back yet again later. If you are working with AVCHD you require to get the greatest tough drives you can afford. 60 minutes of video will use up some thing like 50Gb of storage on your Mac when converted to 1920×1080. If you just want excellent hunting home video to display on your HDTV, but do not want to go broke on challenging drives, Apple delivers to import the motion pictures at a slightly lower resolution (960×540) which requires up a LOT less room with extremely little drop in good quality. I have been generating property movies and exhibiting them on an Apple Tv at that resolution and they appear beautiful. The good quality difference between that resolution and complete HD isn’t that huge of a deal.

If want to try out to get really specialist-good quality video you ought to steer clear of AVCHD cameras and stick to the HDV format concentrating on cameras with larger sensors. But this is wonderful camera for HD home videos at a fantastic cost.

The user interface on this camera is slow and clunky. Sony’s AVCHD cameras have a better interface (utilizing a touch display) but you can even now watch back the videos (which is the primary factor you will do) and it beats the heck out of a tape camera. I wish they had added a dial or button set for modify exposure and/or backlighting handle on the camera. The joystick operates surprisingly nicely for this nevertheless in brilliant light the screen gets washed out adequate that it is hard to tell if your exposure is truly that wonderful or not. This is exactly where a viewfinder would really assist. But these are minor nits because the camera does a excellent occupation at exposure handle on its very own.

As I mentioned earlier this is a quite compact point-and-shoot camera that shoots HD video and for that it really is superb.

I write this critique due to the fact I wish it had been written during the time I was getting my camcorder. I will summarize this critique among the Sony HDR-SR11 vs. Panasonic HDC-HS9 as fundamentally a toss up, but the small points of Sony leaned me to the SR11.

Initial, let me say that I genuinely did not want to buy Sony HDR-SR11, granted a Bravia Television is my LCD of alternative, but I can not stand their proprietary memory. Given that this camcorder was not purchased for images this was not a big deal. Although I commend Panasonic for using SD that can be readily found. Sony is pricey (although some may well say justifiably so simply because of the quality) but competition is great for the shoppers as we advantage via new, high quality, and innovative functions.

A salesman from a certain store told me that Sony was excellent to get for camcorders, and I’d add Nikon or Canon are a way to go for digital cameras, anyway I digress.

Acquiring to see it for myself, initially I purchased the Panasonic HDC-HS9 and soon after a tough selection I had to switch for the little items primarily from software program which I’ll get to later, but initial let me give a side by side comparison between the two right after testing out each product for a couple hours about the characteristics that matter to me at least. I will refer to the products as HS9 and SR11 for the remainder of the assessment.

Look: I’d have to give it to the HS9 for getting noticeably smaller. But the SR11 is not massive (particularly not 90′s camcorder massive), as I have a man sized hand, but the HS9 wins the compact comparison in this case. Whilst we’re on the physical look of it, I was disappointed in the HS9 placement of the external adapter. The battery ought to be physically removed each and every time you want to connect the adapter as the cable connector is behind the battery. For that reason you can not charge the battery simply by pluging in the charging cable as you can on a lot of goods that you can usually do this and as you can for the SR11. And the HS9 forces you to use the external cable when transferring a video, even though this might make sense, but when you have a brief clip and just took the battery off the charger, it’s annoying to get rid of the battery and locate the external adapter each and every time to do so. Poor placement of the external adapter on the HS9 in contrast to the nicely placed (as is with most camcorders, at least with a preceding Canon ZR200 that I own) with the HS9. If size is an concern for you, the HS9 might be your selection.

Video Top quality: My opinion of the top quality among the HS9 and SR11 was comparable. Amongst the two it’s a toss up in the course of daylight conditions as both are superb, and the SR11 is gorgeous as your eye sees it, it seems on the screen, extremely good. The HS9 records in a 1080p vs. a 1080i format, that may give the albeit slight edge in terms of theoretically video high quality to the HS9. Though the application provided with the HS9 to play back these high top quality videos ruins the superb video recording. I hate to say my eye didn’t discover the difference amongst 1080p and 1080i even though my correction lens aren’t the best, mileage of your eyes matter maybe.

In low light situations, the HS9 seems to record slightly brighter images which are decent, the SR11 are a bit darker, although search incredibly realistic. A genuine toss up, and really based on individual preference and would have to say they’re evenly matched for you to make a decision.

In very low light conditions I observed the HS9 surprisingly grainy. It appears to brighten up a extremely dark image therefore resulting in grain. I have not recorded the SR11 in low light circumstances other than discovering a youtube video of a low light problem video and it seemed to preserve it’s realistic tone but remained dark. The HS9 seems to be on the appropriate track to attempt to brighten up items, as the SR11 does not, but at this point I would have to say the HS9 was unsatisfiability grainy.

Both were grainy in bedroom light condition when displaying straight from the camera to the Tv (not recording, just displaying via the cables) although the SR11 may well have had a slight lead when panning or moving the zoom in and out a bit more responsive, although hardly noticeable.

Formats: The HS9 takes the lead in this regard as it has a 24 cinema mode, that records frames at 24 frames like some movies. Otherwise the HS9 records in 60 frames per second. However, the Pinnacle trial version could not handle the 60 fps mode and only the 24 cinema mode (even though it stated it was 30 fps). Though the HS9 software could take care of its personal 60 fps video fine, far more later on software program. The SR11 records it’s videos in 30 fps

Night vision between the two the HS9 makes use of a blue illumination for night vision and the SR11 makes use of the frequently known green illumination as frequently observed on Television. I like the green greater, but the blue was a nice change and this did not have an effect on my choice either way, although it was great to have on each…

Study more

I have bought both camcorders (I admit via BestBuy because returns are a breeze) to compare high quality for about a week, and I must say Sony wins hands down. I was truly hoping the Canon will be the winner considering that I personal the Canon 40D dSLR and wanted to remain within brand, but I’ve produced my choice and purchased the SR11 from Amazon. For the record, I was utilizing iMac three.06GHz intel proc with iMovie/QuickTimePro – none of the cameras offer any software for the Mac, but that did not seem a dilemma:

Sony won me more than in the following areas:

1. Autofocus: Sony seemed a lot more responsive. I have a 2yr old, which can’t appear to keep place for a lot more than a second and the Sony seemed to receive greater focus on him. Canon sometimes took more than 2seconds to receive focus outdoors at about 5x zoom.

two. white balance: For some cause the Canon did not search all-natural to me. The colours had been off, with my son’s pale skin seeking greenish indoors at low light.

3. LCD + viewfinder. The Canon does not have a viewfinder, which I suppose contributes to its light weight. I observed the LCD to be more than enough in overcast climate, but Sony’s three.2″ screen is a pleasure to perform with. It is bigger(2.7″ v.s 3.2″) and significantly smoother LCD. The display is basically gorgeous. Videos show remarkable on it and shooting is very pleasant. I found the touch display to occasionally will need a second push, but fingerprints have been in no way a issue – I got the same amount on the Canon too. The Canon has the joystick/func button which I identified was a bit clumsy to use.

4. compression &amp low light overall performance. Given that I was shooting largely indoors, I found Sony to work slightly far better in low light, focusing a bit more quickly and creating much less noise. I was comparing Sony’s 60i v.s. Canon’s 30p mode. Canon in 60i indoors at low light looked too alien green for my liking. Sony created a bit much less artifacts too.

5. Storage: 60G v.s. 32G of space. Both are extendible through memory card, sony needs the card if you want to shoot nonetheless photos whilst filming.

6. Develop quality. This was a large a single. I’d like my camera for which I paid a very good chunk of money to appear great and feel good. It is very sad to see Canon make these inexpensive feeling and seeking cameras, when their SLRs are built like tanks. Sony was impecable with each detail very properly believed by means of.

7 Sound quality. This was also quite noticeable. Sony’s sound was a lot clearer indoors. It also provides a zoom function on the mic, so that when you use the optical zoom, the mic will also “zoom-in” on the conversation.

eight. Cost. As it stands, HF11 is 150 bucks far more and I can’t justify it.

9. Each camcorders can be hooked with cables straight, but only the Sony contains a cradle, and it is much less difficult to work with – just drop it in and pick it up when done. On the other hand, with the Canon I had to plug two cables each time I wanted to connect it to my Mac – 1 for energy and one particular USB (you can’t connect to Computer with no the camcorder getting powered by the adaptor).

ten. Button operation. Canon has a undesirable design flaw in their fast commence function. You see, if you quit filming, and just close the LCD, the cam goes into standby mode. Nonetheless, by pressing the start button, you can start filming once more with out opening the LCD. On the Sony, the start button is embeded in the middle of the on/off/mode ring. The Canon’s button is a big blob sticking out the back. It is really effortless to accidentally start off filming. It was fairly anoying to uncover that my battery has runout in the vehicle due to the fact I’ve depressed the button. On the bright side I now have 30min of footage of my jacket’s pocket.
11. greater stills. Canon’s 3.2Mpixel shots can’t compare to Sony’s ten.2MP. Also, Sony’s flash is effectively centered over the lens. Canon’s is offset and the light looks off in pictures.

12. Far better OIS (Optical Image Stabilization). I observed that Sony performs far better even though walking.


Now some individuals retain whining about 30p/24p and so on. I am no pro, and to me 24p looked a bit blocky, and 30p supplying quite equivalent top quality to Sony’s 60i mode. I discovered the 60i mode to search quite movie-like too (It kept reminding me of an episode of “The Office” for some reason.)

To maintain issues fair, the Canon’s Pros had been:
1. Lighter weight and far more centered zoom lever position. Sony’s HDD,3.2″ display and viewfinder seem to add a bit of weight and the lever seems to go too far back.
2. flash-based recording medium really should maintain points far more durable, even though I’m not sure flash can sustain as several writes as a normal HDD.

I like this camera. I like the size and the characteristic set, but to my eye, the AVCHD video high quality isn’t fairly there. It’s excellent, but there is still some “star-stepping” visible about light and dark points, specifically in lower light. I’m comparing this to HDV video shot with my HDR-HC1 and I prefer the much less compressed HDV video. That getting said, I don’t miss the video capture method I had to go by way of with HDV to get it onto the laptop or computer for editing, so I will maintain this camera. FYI, for these of you searching for application that works with AVCHD, I’ve had great achievement with Sony Vegas Platinum. Whatever you do, do not purchase Adobe Premier Elements – it doesn’t support AVCHD and is very, quite buggy.

Pro:
– Easy to load video to Pc
– Very good kind aspect not as little as the Canon HF10, but little
– Nice large screen
– Viewfinder for those bright sunny days (HF10 does not have a viewfinder)
– In a position to hold lots of video

Cons:
– Some compression artifacts visible in video
– Some skipping in video in the course of fast movements/ quickly pans
– Slow focus lock in indoor lighting conditions