<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon FS22 Dual Flash Memory Camcorder with 32 GB Internal Memory and 48x Advanced Zoom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theyearmovie.com/446/canon-fs22-dual-flash-memory-camcorder-with-32-gb-internal-memory-and-48x-advanced-zoom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theyearmovie.com/446/canon-fs22-dual-flash-memory-camcorder-with-32-gb-internal-memory-and-48x-advanced-zoom/</link>
	<description>Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:30:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Morgan</title>
		<link>http://theyearmovie.com/446/canon-fs22-dual-flash-memory-camcorder-with-32-gb-internal-memory-and-48x-advanced-zoom/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearmovie.com/446/canon-fs22-dual-flash-memory-camcorder-with-32-gb-internal-memory-and-48x-advanced-zoom/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>Great camcorder. Lightweight, easy to use great video. Took it on a 16-day cruise / tour a week after the purchase, and it meets all requirements. Battery life of over 2 hours per charge, a lot of free support to a full day. The entire trip is not complete yet, the 32 GB of internal memory, we (slightly more than 5 + hours after 7 hours available, all in top quality. Purchased and used a 16GB SDHC card for still pix, and it also has very nice. The downside? Extreme small size and light weight make it difficult to control camera shake, especially when zooming, lack of viewfinder is a real slanderer.&#013;Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great camcorder. Lightweight, easy to use great video. Took it on a 16-day cruise / tour a week after the purchase, and it meets all requirements. Battery life of over 2 hours per charge, a lot of free support to a full day. The entire trip is not complete yet, the 32 GB of internal memory, we (slightly more than 5 + hours after 7 hours available, all in top quality. Purchased and used a 16GB SDHC card for still pix, and it also has very nice. The downside? Extreme small size and light weight make it difficult to control camera shake, especially when zooming, lack of viewfinder is a real slanderer.&#13;Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Strong</title>
		<link>http://theyearmovie.com/446/canon-fs22-dual-flash-memory-camcorder-with-32-gb-internal-memory-and-48x-advanced-zoom/comment-page-1/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theyearmovie.com/446/canon-fs22-dual-flash-memory-camcorder-with-32-gb-internal-memory-and-48x-advanced-zoom/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>I had high expectations for this camcorder. I did some research and despite limited reviews I decided to buy. He had all the features I needed for a standard HD camcorder, and I thought the price was fair. It was a long zoom, and it was small, compact and lightweight. . . . almost like Spielzeug.Die quality of the video in bright light was great. Indoors, if not, the camcorder to impress me. In typical bedroom lighting, the video was very, very grainy and unacceptable. When zoomed out the video was very shaky, but a tripod have helped. The deal breaker for me was the performance in low light, and when I say, I mean little light in a well lit room with a lamp and a 75 watt Glühbirne.Ich this camcorder was because of the Canon name and the properties such as, but in the end the quality was not there, especially for the price. I would not recommend this camcorder in situations where the lighting is not perfect.&#013;Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had high expectations for this camcorder. I did some research and despite limited reviews I decided to buy. He had all the features I needed for a standard HD camcorder, and I thought the price was fair. It was a long zoom, and it was small, compact and lightweight. . . . almost like Spielzeug.Die quality of the video in bright light was great. Indoors, if not, the camcorder to impress me. In typical bedroom lighting, the video was very, very grainy and unacceptable. When zoomed out the video was very shaky, but a tripod have helped. The deal breaker for me was the performance in low light, and when I say, I mean little light in a well lit room with a lamp and a 75 watt Glühbirne.Ich this camcorder was because of the Canon name and the properties such as, but in the end the quality was not there, especially for the price. I would not recommend this camcorder in situations where the lighting is not perfect.&#13;Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
