Comments on: Canon VIXIA HF S11 HD Dual Flash Memory Camcorder with 10x Optical Zoom

By: Hiroyuki Ikezi

Hiroyuki Ikezi — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:21:01 +0000

I bought three of this video Camaras a month ago for the production of videos of live jazz performances. I’m separated and make video recordings and sound together, when I get manipulating Goods: The image quality that of 52 “LCD TV and HD projector is very satisfactory, though the camera does not make shallow depth of professional cameras. noise is reduced as compared to similar models that I bought a few years, although I have not made quantitative comparisons. 62GB of internal flash memory is large enough for the reception normally 2 hours long stages. The optical image stabilizer works well and shakes offset by a little too light weight of the Kamera.Bads: The battery only lasts an hour. Canon should sell battery packs like the ones they sell their SLRs. microphone on this camera very poor quality and sound make. External microphone. should be used, if you will nornal / better Klangqualität.Andere Thoughts: This camera performs the video data into 2 GB files, if for a long time on video recorded. I think this is a good idea if we consider very long time Data transfer to computer. However, this requires a bit too much work on several files from some cameras zusammengestellt.Die prices for mail-order business in Japan (January 2, 2010) is $ 720 at current exchange rate of U.S. $ 1 = 92 yen. This is offered a half of the price. Rating: 4 / 5

By: toto tarentino

toto tarentino — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:09:39 +0000

This is the best HD camera I’ve heard so far. great features and image quality, the only thing I would say that I thought it was a little smaller when they are buying. Rating: 5 / 5

By: D. Yang

D. Yang — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:52:04 +0000

This is the first time that I bought Conon camcorder. I am a big fan of Canon cameras. Over the years I have purchased more than 10 Canon cameras. Died After my Sony camcorder, I decided to Canon camcorders based on reviews I wechseln.Ich this camcorder in October last year, when it is straight. It cost me over $ 1400 I must say that it is such a waste of money. I was so disappointed with the picture quality. It’s just not clear. If you enlarge it, everything is blurred. The pictures make me dizzy if I am to see them on the computer or TV. I ordered it online without having to test, because I trusted the reviews. It was a big mistake! Because of my busy schedule I have forgotten it right back. Now it’s too late to come back to it. I was at the end) to another (different brands, which will cost much less and buy me a better picture quality. Rating: 1 / 5

By: Tarak Patel

Tarak Patel — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:51:37 +0000

This allows me to 6 hours after admission with the built-in HD in 64 concerts. But wait. . . . . . . . . . The battery only last 93 minutes. This sucks and I would have bought the cheaper version. 93 minutes means I cannot record 6 hours, if I do not buy more batteries, which is stupid. Rating: 4 / 5

By: Ronald Foote

Ronald Foote — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:07:57 +0000

I’m in the market for a very good camcorder, and I am is pretty serious about this. However, the hinge must be a little stronger, because I think that pressing the Wide / Tight zoom function can move the camera even if they cause on a tripod. This prize is a better battery and charger should be included. Also, I saw a remote function, you can place on the tripod, but very little about how to written how it works. Rating: 1 / 5