#1 written by S. Smith
about 2 years ago

Quote

I have this old for 13 years and I think it will be good for a 13 years old. I do not think I would as a family video camera. It is not the best quality but ok for a teenager. I’ve tested it and it seems ok, but I did not see the video on the computer, so she played on the LCD. Sound seems a little low. The light was good and shakeyness appear only if I do not ever my hand. Overall, this seems made to feel a little cheap. It is very easy, until you get the dividend paid on 2 AA’s I [. . . ] In another “giant retailer” and I again discussed below, after reading the reviews here, but as I said, it is for a teenager, so I’ll probably keep it. Although, I would not pay 239th 00, supposedly the retail price. Rating: 3 / 5
#2 written by Dirk Van
about 2 years ago

Quote

I was weary to buy this product, because no one had checked. I have never written a review myself, but I think I should be an end to anonymity, this contempt thing legen.Es an HD camera was allegedly held down in a tiny hand is the form for only $ 130 einigen.Ja that right. . . it is much too good to be true it looks like long and short is. . . because of the high (he’s) resolution (720p not 1080i – Full HD current standard), the actual frame rate of your films are about 15 fps, 30 fps unreported. The result is disgusting jumpy video. Couple that with a lackluster low-light capabilities and a real crappy image stabilization system and receive video, which is unwatchable.Ich would come to me and to the more proven and white in a position Ultra.Ich Flip Video, it’s cheap, so I perhaps go easy, but should. . . It is not really doing anything but producing unwatchable video. What would I pay for it? Not $ 100, & 10 is not Is not Nothin ‘! Stay Away. Rating: 1 / 5

DXG DXG 567VP 5.0MP HD Camcorder with 2.0-Inch Hi-Res LCD and 2x Zoom

Related:

Tag Cloud

Recent Posts

Categories

Blogroll